Aug 31 2009

Could Air France Flight 447 Have Been Brought Down By An Anal Bomb?

An interesting bit of news was released, today, by a Gulf news source. Gulf-Daily-News announced that the lunatic bomber that blew itself up, and injured Deputy Interior Minister Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, escaped detection, and received permission to fly on the Prince’s private jet, after he hid the bomb “in his anus”. If so, this would be a new technique, and could, obviously, make airport security screenings much more “difficult”. Personally, I consider it an affront that I have to take off my shoes before getting on a commercial airplane, because of the “shoe bomber”, but this could bring security inspections to a new low!

An interesting note is that Richard Reid, the “shoe bomber”, was apparently the second attempt at using a shoe bomb, according to several sources, including Yossef Bodansky. (1). In his book, “Chechan Jihad”, Bodansky stated that Mohammad Mansour Jabarah, aka Abderraouf Jdey, used a shoe bomb to bring down American Airlines flight 587, bound from JFK to the Dominican Republic. This crash occurred on November 12, 2001, two months after 9/11. In this crash, just like in the case of TWA 800, there were predictions of an “incident” by Islamists, and eye witness accounts were not consistent with the “official government findings” as to the cause of the crash. (2)

U.S. Intelligence received a threat specific to Veteran’s Day
Veteran’s Day fell on Sunday, November 11th (in 2001) and the holiday was observed on Monday the 12th, the day FL587

crashed.  Bill Gertz, writing for the Washington Times on November 13th, had this to say:

One intelligence official said a warning was sent to senior Bush administration officials last week stating that

unidentified terrorists were planning to carry out some type of mass attack on Nov. 11 – Veterans Day . . . the

intelligence report about the possible attack was specific enough to raise concerns, this official said.  A second U.S.

official confirmed that there were “some reports that something might happen in connection with Veterans Day”.

Of further interest, in light of Jabarah’s revelations about Jdey (the alleged FL587 shoe bomber), is this statement from


The warning originated in a North African nation that in the past had been associated with international terrorism.

Gertz did not identify the North African nation.  The alleged FL587 shoe bomber, Abderraouf Jdey, was known to Al Qaeda

as Farouk the Tunisian.  Tunisia is on the North African coast.  The link to North Africa from this pre-November 12th

intelligence along with the information about Farouk the Tunisian is interesting, and perhaps more than a coincidence.

In his book “Chechan Jihad”, Bodansky points out that the liquid explosives that were used to bring down 2 Russian airliners on  August 24, 2004, were probably the same explosives used to bring down American Airlines flight 587. (My comment: probably TWA 800, as well.)

An especially telling fact, brought out by Bodansky, Bill Gertz (2), and Professor Jonathan Turley in Testimony before the Subcommittee on Aviation, Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure (3), is that the FAA issued an information circular, on December 11, 2001, one month after the American Airlines flight 587 crash, but almost 2 weeks before Richard Reid’s attempted to bring down American Airlines flight 63, stressing that shoes should be inspected for possible weapons or devices. Sure, it could be pure coincidence, but I do not believe in coincidences. I think the government knew that American Airlines flight 587 was brought down by a bomb,and knew, or  speculated, that it might have been hidden in a shoe, and thus they issued that circular.

Interestingly, the FBI issued a BOLO for Jdey,, but he has not been found. (Of course, if he did blow up American Airlines flight 587, he would not be found. (DUH) They only know that he attended terrorist training camps in Afghanistan, and was in the lead for a second round of attacks, after 9/11. Some have even suggested that he might have been the person to plant the anthrax, which I find totally plausible. (5) He did create a “martyrdom video” in 2001, and he was reported to be on the second team for al Qaeda aerial attacks in 2001. Kaleid Sheik Mohammed basically gave up on the idea of a second wave of attacks after he realized that Arabs would be targeted after 9/11, and thus refused easy access to the United States for terrorism related activities.

So, now we have a Muslim wack job shoving explosives up his anus (I know, that is redundant), and blowing himself up. I’m not surprised. (And, there may even be documented “experiments” in the field of “Ass Bombs” , since a Muslim was caught a few years ago with a cell phone shoved up his ass. Was that a test run? (4)

Drug smugglers have been swallowing balloons with various drugs in them for years, in an effort to escape detection. I suppose hiding explosives in your body is the next logical step. I can only say that I have a pilot’s license, and thus don’t have to be subjected to airport security. To me, having to remove my shoes was humiliating enough, but I can only imagine what will be coming to airport screening in the future. I used to joke (and I think some airline actually tried it), that the solution was Nude-Air. Just get nude, and fasten your seat belt. Of course, this makes even that absurd, as a solution.

(1) “Chechan Jihad” by Jossef Bodansky





Aug 29 2009

Finally, Kopechne Closure


Naming a helathcare Bill After Ted Kennedy is Like Naming a Marina After Scott Peterson

Aug 29 2009

Obama Takes Dog For Walk

Here is a cute little picture of Obama taking Bo, the Portuguese water dog, on his first walk. Thanks to BigFurHat at

Aug 28 2009

Fascinating Coverage of Obama’s Marxist and Anti-Capitalist Advisors And Reagan’s Warning From The Grave!

These videos from Glenn Beck are fascinating. I knew that Obama was a Marxist, because he basically said so in one of his autobiographies. I read both of them before the election. But, when you look at the radicals that he surrounds himself with, and who he employs to write various bills, and who advise groups and companies on how to get money from the government, it just blows your mind. I need some of that duct tape George Bush told me to buy; my head is about to explode!
During this clip, it is pointed out the Hugo Chavez warned Fidel Castro that after some of Obama’s actions (essentially nationalizing GM), they might end to the right of Obama!

Another part, where it is mentioned that Cass Sunstein states that we should “celebrate tax day”.

And yet more, including an interview with Rush Limbaugh where he speculates that Obama may be destroying the Democratic party, but it is too soon to say for sure. Personally, I think he is. Too many people are now saying “This is not what I voted for!” as the polls demonstrate with his rapidly falling popularity.

And, finally, a speech from 1964 where Ronald Reagan warns us about virtually every thing that Obama is foisting on the country in terms of high taxation, large government, socialism, and communism. One of the best lines in the speech (and there are many of them) is Reagan’s quoting of Senator Clarke of Pennsylvania “(Clarke) defines liberalism as meeting the material needs of the masses through the full power of centralized government”. Reagan’s response: “Well, I, for one, resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me, the free men and women of this country, as the masses. This is a term we haven’t applied to ourselves in America. But, beyond that, the full power of centralized government! This was the very thing the founding fathers sought to minimize. They knew that governments don’t control things. The government can’t control the economy without controlling people. And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve it’s purpose. They also knew, those founding fathers, that outside of it’s legitimate functions, government does nothing as well, or as economically, as the private sector of the economy.” He then goes on with examples. An incredible warning from the grave.
As a personal afterthought. How much better our nation would have fared if Barry Goldwater had been elected as President of the United States, rather than Lyndon Johnson, in 1964! It can be argued that Johnson’s presidency was the socialist camel’s nose under the tent, unfortunately.

Aug 28 2009

Obama Says To See What He Believes, See Who He Surrounds Himself With…Communists, Marsists, One World Governmentistas

Well, Obama said it himself during his campaign. He said that in order to see what he believes, you have to look at who he surrounds himself with for advice. He mentions Paul Volker, General Jones, Warren Buffet. But, now that he is in office, who has his ear? Radical environmentalists, self proclaimed Communists and Marxists, and people who favor a “one world government.” Just think of the implications of that! Something like the UN (arguably one of the most corrupt and corrupted organizations in the world), running the world. See it all. Incredible stuff.

Aug 28 2009

Why Does Barack Obama Need Civilian National Security Force?

Some great videos from Glenn Beck that explore this very troubling question, especially when you look at some of the recent appointments to his administration that I have written about earlier.
Part 1

Part 2

Aug 26 2009

The National Debt Road Trip

A great little video that explains the national debt in a way that almost anyone can understand.

Aug 25 2009

What is with Obama’s administration? First a depopulation nutjob, now a confirmed Marxist!

It was bad enough news when Barack Obama announced that his science czar was to be John Holdren, but now he has announced that Van Jones will be the clean energy czar! What else can he do to destroy the United States?

We now have a fan of one-world government, depopulation, and legal rights for trees as science czar, and a self-admitted Marxist in charge of green energy!  (Not to mention a Christian fundamentalist in charge of the National Institutes of Health! Although Francis Collins is a fine scientist, by most accounts, I question how a Christian fundamentalist can really support evolution, which is an essential aspect of any science-related job, and especially one that involves medicine and evolution at it’s core. Let’s hope he can keep his personal religious beliefs away from his duties at the NIH. But, I digress.)

In 1977, John Holdren co-authored a book titled “Eccoscience: Population, Resources, Environment” along with Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich. In this very long book, he strongly advocated for depopulation. The book could be summarized by the statement: “To provide a high quality of life for all, there must be fewer people.” To accomplish that, he advocated for forced sterilizations, limiting women to no more than one or two children, and forcing unmarried women to abort their children.
The following is a direct quote from his book:

Isn’t this just the man for the job of science czar??? And, he also famously predicted that the oceans would rise 13 feet by the end of the 21st century due to global warming, even though the highly dubious IPCC report only predicts a sea level rise of 13 inches by the end of the century.

In the above mentioned book, Holdren also argued for zero GDP growth, along with zero population growth.

It is by now abundantly clear that the GNP cannot grow forever. Why should it? Why should we not strive for zero economic growth (ZEG) as well as zero population growth?”

What a brilliant idea, especially right after the Obama administration has foisted a $10 trillion budget deficit upon the children of America! When the youth of America fully realize the impact of that fact, and are told that we should not have economic growth that might at least help to pay for that staggering debt load, they might want to consider suicide, which will probably be handily supplied by your local government controlled doctor, if and when you can get an appointment. That will help to both lower population, and reduce GNP at the same time! I am beginning to see the logic.

In 1973, Holdren stated, in relation to the population of the United States,  “210 million now is too many and 280 million in 2040 is likely to be much too many”. The current population of the United States is a bit over 307 million. I guess he got that wrong.

Holdren stated in another book that he co-authored with Paul and Anne Ehrlich in 1973, “Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions”:

A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States. De-devolopment means bringing our economic system (especially patterns of consumption) into line with the realities of ecology and the global resource situation. Resources and energy must be diverted from frivolous and wasteful uses overdeveloped countries to filling the genuine needs of underdeveloped countries. This effort must be largely political, especially with regard to our overexploitation of world resources, but the campaign should be strongly supplemented by legal and boycott action against polluters and others whose activities damage the environment.

The need for de-development presents our economists with a major challenge. They must design a stable, low-consumption economy in which there is a much more equitable distribution of wealth than the present one. Redistribution of wealth both within and among nations is absolutely essential, if a decent life is to be provided for every human being.

It can’t get much clearer than that. He favors depopulation and redistribution of wealth. He is another Marxist, just like Obama, and Obama’s new pick for green czar, Van Jones. Plus, what better way to depopulate the country than by socialized medicine, where the government gets to decide who gets what treatment, who is allowed to have children, and how many, etc. When you look at it, it all starts to fall into place.

But, to make it even worse, Holdren also argued for giving up some national sovereignty, in favor of a world police force and government! As verified by the “Accuracy In Media” website ( )

pages 942-943 the book calls for a “Planetary Regime” that “should control the global economy and dictate by force the number of children allowed to be born.”Page 942 does include a heading, “Toward a Planetary Regime,” and page 943 declares, “The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime should have some power to enforce the agreed limits. As with the Law of the Sea and other international agreements, all agreements for regulating population sizes, resource development, and pollution should be subject to revision and modification in accordance with changing conditions.”

World Government?

Holdren cannot wiggle out of responsibility for these statements because he does not specifically attribute them to anyone else in particular. Hence, the endorsement of a “planetary regime” can be correctly attributed to the authors of the book, including Holdren. What’s more, Holdren’s endorsement of the Law of the Sea Treaty is currently relevant because this is a treaty that Obama is now pushing for ratification by the U.S. Senate.

The book declares on page 943: “Should a Law of the Sea be successfully established, it could serve as a model for a future Law of the Atmosphere to regulate the use of airspace, to monitor climate change, and to control atmospheric pollution. Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP [United Nations Environmental Program] and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime-sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural re-sources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist.”

This is not only dangerous but an accurate prediction of what is currently happening under Obama, who is pushing Senate ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty and hoping to produce another and much tougher global warming treaty at a United Nations conference in December in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Global Enforcer

Zombietime highlights that the Holdren book declares on page 917 that “If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force.”

This statement is followed by the important caveat: “But it seems probable that, as long as most people fail to comprehend the magnitude of the danger, that step will be impossible.”

In this case, the caveat is not convincing, in part because Holdren seems to have dedicated his career to exaggerating “the danger” and can be counted on to continue to do so in his White House position.

It goes without saying that the major media should belatedly begin to probe Holdren’s views with a careful reading of the book Ecoscience.

I’m sorry, but I consider this chilling, and not the kind of philosophy that I want in any government official, much less the “science czar.”

But now, to add insult to injury, Obama appoints an admitted Marxist and Communist as his “green jobs czar”, officially “Special Advisor for Green Jobs at the White House Council on Environmental Quality”. As the East Bay Express reported about Van Jones:

One week later, while Jones was observing the first large rally since the lifting of the city’s state of emergency, he got swept up in mass arrests. It was a turning point in his life. Jones had planned to move to Washington, DC, and had already landed a job and an apartment there. But in jail, he said, “I met all these young radical people of color — I mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was, like, ‘This is what I need to be a part of.’” Although he already had a plane ticket, he decided to stay in San Francisco. “I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary.” In the months that followed, he let go of any lingering thoughts that he might fit in with the status quo. “I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th,” he said. “By August, I was a communist.”

In 1994, the young activists formed a socialist collective, Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement, or STORM, which held study groups on the theories of Marx and Lenin and dreamed of a multiracial socialist utopia.

The following video has a lot of information on him:

So, what can I say? It looks pretty bleak for America. If the founding fathers could see what was happening, they would not be turning over in their graves; they would be spinning, uncontrollably, in their graves!

Aug 24 2009

Massachusetts On Verge Of Passing Bill That Could Result In $1000/fines For Those Who Refuse Quarantine

The Massachusetts state legislature is on the verge of passing sweeping new health emergency rules. These would do such things as essentially forcing vaccinations and immunizing health care workers. Additionally, if a person refused to be quarantined, for example, they could be fined up to $1000 per day. While some might argue that these are needed laws, they are just one more strike at freedom within the country.

Aug 24 2009

ABC’s John Stossel Destroys/Pulverizes/Crushes Obama’s anti-American ‘Health Care’ Plan

Interesting video by John Stossel of ABC. Some of the interesting points in the video is that the wait for dental care in England is so long that some people do their own dental work with pliers and vodka. In Canada, although a dog can get a CT scan in 1 day, the wait for a human is generally about a month. Additionally, in Canada, the average wait in an emergency room is about 23 hours! As I have also pointed out, people from countries with socialized medicine come to the United States for health care. If the United States gets socialized medicine, where will Americans go for health care. The video even pointed out how people like Desmond Tutu and Silvio Berlusconi have come to the United States for medical care.

Aug 19 2009

Swedish Lesbians Suck Sperm Banks Dry

Sorry, I could not resist posting this story. Is this the kind of thing that could beset the United States, land of the free and home of the brave? The article states:

So bad have things got that prospective customers at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg are now forced to wait 18 months for treatment.

The problem, the Göteborgs-Posten explains, is that a 2005 law change granted “female same-sex couples” the right to fertility treatment at Swedish hospitals. Previously, this privilege extended only to married women or those who were “registered heterosexual partners”.

The article also states that couples must now go abroad to get impregnated. Maybe that could be a niche industry for ObamaCare!

Read it all:

Aug 19 2009

Truly Insightful Words From 1961! Ronald Reagan Speaks Out Against Socialized Medicine

In this audio recording from 1961, Ronald Reagan speaks out against socialized medicine. The arguments for socialized medicine, brought forth by the socialists of the time, were identical to the arguments that we are hearing from the Obama administration in regards to health insurance today. The need for a government takeover of health care was being presented as an “emergency”. He also points out how the government will eventually be able to tell doctors where they must live and work, since some places may have too few doctors, and other too many. Americans would eventually be unable to determine their own destiny! Remember, this recording is from almost 50 years ago, and yet it is true, today, as it was then. Truly insightful words from Ronald Reagan.

The scariest part of the speech comes at the end. Here, Reagan is talking about how government control of health care is, essentially, the camel’s nose under the tent. Then: “Other federal programs that will invade every area of freedom as we have known it in this country, until one day, as Norman Thomas said, we will awake to find that we have socialism. And, if you don’t do this, and I don’t do it, one of these days you and I are going to spend our sunset years telling our children, and our childrens’ children, what it once was like, in America, when men were free.”

Aug 19 2009

#1 RINGTONE IN THE COUNTRY: Obama Care Remixx (OLD PEOPLE) By Obama / Rush Limbaugh

Great little ditty about old people and the Obamacare program. After the ditty, there is a brief discussion about a 105 year old woman who received a pace maker at the age of 99. Obama is questioned about this in a brief exchange, and his response is not encouraging or “hopeful” for old people.

Aug 19 2009

What It May Be Like To Order Pizza In The Future

Aug 17 2009

Canadian National Healthcare System Imploding

Boy, Obamabots are not going to like this news. Just when they were hoping that the United States, perhaps soon the be the United Socialist States, was about to get nationalized health care, our neighbors to the north state that things are not working out so well for them in their nationalized health care system.

SASKATOON — The incoming president of the Canadian Medical Association says this country’s health-care system is sick and doctors need to develop a plan to cure it.

Dr. Anne Doig says patients are getting less than optimal care and she adds that physicians from across the country – who will gather in Saskatoon on Sunday for their annual meeting – recognize that changes must be made.

“We all agree that the system is imploding, we all agree that things are more precarious than perhaps Canadians realize,” Doing said in an interview with The Canadian Press.

The article goes on to discuss how “change” is badly needed. Ironically, some people seem to feel that the system has to “change” to something that looks more like the American system. They feel that, and our “leaders” are trying to tell us that we need something more like the Canadian system.

As I’ve said before, people from countries with socialized medicine, like Canada, come to the US when they need quality health care. If we get ObamaCare, where will Americans go when they need quality health care?

Read the whole article at

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy